Integration is described by many societal stakeholders and by media as one of the major contemporary challenges facing society in Sweden. This article reviews some important labour market integration measures for immigrants in Sweden and outlines some of the insights from recent studies of how the measures are organized in practice. The article illustrates that while LMI support for immigrants is heavily subsidized by the state and administered through the Swedish Public Employment Service, much of the actual support efforts are provided by other public, private and social/nonprofit organizations who collaborate in projects or as part of local agreements. This creates a complexity in practice that is not necessarily conducive to a more sustainable integration of immigrants into the labour market.
Article
This article reviews the most important labour market integration (LMI) support measures made available to recent immigrants in Sweden and outlines some of the important insights from recent studies of how the measures are organized in practice. The article focusses on recent immigrants, as LMI measures in Sweden generally target this group which is considered as facing the greatest difficulties to become employed.
The integration of immigrants, and refugees in particular, into the labour market has been a standing issue in Sweden over the past decades (see e.g. Dahlstedt, 2013). The country has a large migrant population and has over many years taken in more refugees per capita than any other European country (UNHCR, 2011, 2015). In 2015, close to 163 000 asylum seekers arrived to Sweden, an increase of 80 000 compared to 2014 (Swedish Migration Board, 2015). While numbers in asylum seekers have dropped considerably since 2016 due to more restrictive immigration legislation, those already in the country continue to face many challenges to become an integrated part of society (see e.g. Wikström and Sténs, 2019). They remain unemployed for longer periods of time or end up on more precarious employment contracts and lower-paid jobs than their native counterparts (Bevelander and Pendakur, 2014; Delmi, 2018). They are also over-represented in sectors with labour shortages (Segendorf and Teljosou, 2011) and prone to non-recognition of (educational) qualifications, which can severely inhibit movement out of low-wage, lowstatus and insecure jobs, even years after refugees have settled in Sweden (Delmi, 2018)…
Résumé
Plan
Auteur
Recent publications:
• BRORSTRÖM Sara & DIEDRICH Andreas (2020), ‟Boundaries of collaboration – The case of a temporary housing complex for refugees in Sweden”, Public Management Review, DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2020.1846767;
• DIEDRICH Andreas, BERGSTRÖM Ola, RISBERG Annette & SIMONSSON Nicklas (2020), Forskning i kor thet #15: Integration av nyanlända på arbetsmarknaden, Stockholm: Forte;
• NILSSON-LINDÉN Hanna, DIEDRICH Andreas & BAUMANN Henrikke (2020), ‟Life cycle work: A pro cess study of the emergence and performance of life cycle practice”, Organization & Environment, https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619893971;
• BRORSTRÖM Sara & DIEDRICH Andreas (2020), ‟Att riva gränserna genom att skapa nya. Om samverkan i projektet. Tillsammans för jobb och integration i Askimsviken”, GRI-rapport 2020:1, Gothenburg: Gothenburg Research Institute, ISSN 1400-4801.
html et pdf (par article) Ajouter au panier
- Mis en ligne sur Cairn.info le 30/04/2021
- https://doi.org/10.3917/rindu1.212.0109
![Chargement](./static/images/loading.gif)
Veuillez patienter...